In a candid interview with Rolling Stone, pop icon Lorde opened up about her experiences with psychedelic therapy, a practice involving the controlled use of substances like psilocybin and MDMA to treat emotional trauma. While the subject was deeply personal, one unexpected comment from Lorde has left fans shocked, confused, and angry.

Lorde described how, during one of her therapy sessions, she ended up watching the infamous 1995 sex tape of Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee. The video, which was stolen and distributed without their consent, has long been cited as one of the most egregious early examples of internet-era privacy violations.

Surprisingly, Lorde called the tape “beautiful,” referring to what she saw as “uninhibited love” and “vulnerability” between the couple. Her intention may have been to comment on the emotional connection between the two stars, but her framing — especially within a context of self-healing — has been widely criticized.

Critics argue that Lorde’s comments romanticize a traumatic event that Pamela Anderson has openly said caused immense damage to her life and marriage. In past interviews, Anderson has described the leak as “soul-crushing,” adding that it made her feel violated and exploited on a global scale.

Social media quickly erupted in outrage. Twitter users labeled Lorde’s remarks as “weird,” “gross,” and “tone-deaf.” Many pointed out that by framing a non-consensual event in such poetic terms, she was unintentionally downplaying the trauma of those involved.

Some fans tried to defend Lorde, suggesting she may have meant no harm and that her comments stemmed from a place of personal emotional exploration. Still, others countered that being introspective does not excuse ignoring the context and consent involved in the tape’s history.

Pamela Anderson herself has not publicly commented on Lorde’s remarks as of now. However, Anderson’s recent resurgence in the public eye, thanks to her memoir Love, Pamela and the Netflix documentary Pamela, a Love Story, has brought renewed attention to the pain and consequences she endured after the tape’s release.

Lorde has yet to respond to the backlash. As a celebrity known for her thoughtful lyrics and introspection, her silence on the matter has surprised many. Some are calling for a public clarification or apology, while others suggest this moment could be used to educate others about the long-lasting impact of privacy violations.

The situation raises important questions about how we talk about celebrity trauma, especially when the stories involve violations that still carry emotional weight today. While Lorde may have intended to express empathy, the execution of her message struck a nerve with the public.

This incident is yet another example of how public figures, even those known for sensitivity, can misstep when discussing complex issues. The internet never forgets — especially when pain is repackaged as beauty without consent from those who lived it.

As Lorde continues to explore emotional healing through therapy and music, fans hope she will take this opportunity to reflect, learn, and perhaps offer a more nuanced take in the future.

Meanwhile, this serves as a reminder of how deeply personal wounds can be reopened by careless commentary — even unintentionally. Pamela Anderson’s story remains a cautionary tale, not a beautiful one, and one that deserves to be handled with care.